The Wanhao D9, or the identical but rebadged Monoprice Maker Pro, is a deeply flawed 3d printer. At almost every stage in the process the designers made decisions that plumb the depths of bad engineering. In this article, we'll take a slightly tongue in cheek look at these flaws, and I'll suggest fixes for anyone unfortunate enough to own this attention hungry beast.
"What were they thinking?"
I shake my head as I examine my new second hand MK1 D9...
"Is that a spring belt tensioner I see? Yikes.... and oh my, axial fans with hugely restricted inlet / outlet areas? Wow..... they can't work very well.... hey the Y axis seems... interesting, held by just those two gantry plates with... sprung V wheels on them? Huh... Lets just check the build plate for rotational stiffness and.... oh dear."
This forms a small section of my thinking after unpacking and assembling my D9 3d printer. Bought second hand on ebay, with the seller assuring me it had only has about 50 hours of print time. I believed him, and went looking for reviews. I found almost none, not really, just a few French videos on youtube where, although I couldn't really understand what they were saying, they seemed enthusiastic. And their test prints looked good. OK, thinks me, I'll give it a go - any problems, I'm sure I can mod my way around them. Doh!
Don't misunderstand, you can fix many of the cardinal sins that Wanhao committed on the design of this 3d printer, but it will take considerable time and for best results, you will need to spend money. Once complete you'll be able to get decent prints - but by that point, your printer may be a Wanhao in name only.
Note that I have a background in mechanical engineering, so this wont be a "little Timmies first 3d printer" style review. It is also not a "specs review" by a site that hasn't actually tested the product in question (caugh-all3dp.com-caugh). We'll be talking in real practical terms, and getting into the underlying engineering concepts that define how well 3d printers work - or in the case of the D9, don't.
Quick Links, and current status of the design issues on the MK2
- Motor and Part Cooling
- V wheels on 4040 T-Slot - Current Status: OMG unchanged
- Sprung Belt Preloaders - Status: Still present
- Sprung V Wheel - Current Status: "Improved" but not really
- Warped Heat Bed - Current Status: Still an issue
- Geometry - Current Status: Unchanged
- Z Braces - Current Status: Fixed in MK2
- Firmware - Current Status: Badly outdated
- Is that all you got??
- So, what did they do right?
- TL:DR Summary of each fail
- Recommendations instead of the D9?
- Conclusions and thoughts on Chinese engineering
Yes, as you will soon find out this is a long and detailed breakdown. Skip to the TL:DR (Too Long: Didn't Read) summary near the bottom if you get tired of it!
Motor and Part Cooling
Perhaps the biggest failure on the D9 was not just the choice of using two axial fans for part and stepper cooling, which was bad enough, but the hapless way they implemented them. This extended to the MKII and the lazy way they designed in the new centrifugal fan for part cooling. Getting back to axial fans, they are fine when you want to move lots of air in an unrestricted manner. They simply do not work when there is a requirement to push against a static pressure - essentially the air flow separates from the blades, becomes turbulent and goes into a stall condition. At which point, they lose 90+% of their function as fans. Which is a technical way of saying, that trying to use an axial fan to push or pull air through a narrow gap, is a recipe for failure. Wanhao tried to do both.
So, lets take a closer look.... click the pictures for a better view.
Part Cooling Fan
MK1: As you can see from the annotations in Fig 2, the main part cooling fan is squeezed into the bottom, with a couple of little plastic spacers holding it 3.8mm away from the heat sink plate above (just over 1/8"). Yes, that small gap you can see is all the space the fan has to suck air through. Worst still, this tiny slot is only fully "open" on the side pointing at the nozzle - it is totally blocked on the back, and has just two 13mm (1/2") gaps on each side. Of course, the airflow also needs to take a sharp 90° bend to reach the fan blades, good luck there. So in total, it has one 25x3.8mm and two 13x3.8mm gaps. If this were not insane enough, I checked and measured the location of the miniscule airflow that does actually exit the other side (underneath, you can see the black duct screwed onto the fan), and it is literally pointing about 2cm (just under 1") to the left of the actual nozzle!! Incredible. As such, the "part cooling" on the MKI is entirely non-functional and purely cosmetic.
MKII: They have added a proper centrifugal fan - in fact it is, and I quote, a "Customrise cooling fan, accuracy beyond your expectation".... yeah, really says that.... Anyway, this is an improvement, but I am not convinced. There are no ducts to narrow the outlet area and direct cooling towards the end of the nozzle, instead it just blows "in the general direction of" - which includes the rest of the hot end. So yes this is an better than the MKI, although that is not saying much given that a kitten strapped to the extruder and panting gently on the nozzle would probably be better than that abomination. And I note it is similar to the Creality CR-10S pro which produces excellent prints, but still, as with the CR-10S Pro, many people swap it out.
Heat Sink Cooling Fan
Moving on, the heat sink fan is suppose to remove heat from the stepper and any heat that creeps up from the hot end, and here Wanhao made some design choices that I find truly amusing. I want you to look closely at Fig 3 (click on to enlarge), where the assembly is removed from the printer, and Fig 4, with the fan pushed to one side. Note how the fan is essentially blocked where it is under the stepper motor, leaving only a remaining 40% or so with access to unrestricted air flow above. Look down underneath this, and you will see the "blades" of the heat sink, and how they dont actually reach to the end of the aluminium block. Not shown in the pictures, is how the cuts into the aluminium that create the blades, extend to the front of the extruder assembly. So - they are supposed to act as channels for the air flow. But.... the overlap between where the fan is not blocked from above, and where the channels actually start, is just 6mm (1/4"). The central fan motor section then blocks all but the outside two slots - giving us a total of two 2x6mm slots for the fan to try and blow air through. Unsurprisingly then, the airflow that passes through these two channels, and escapes at the front of the extruder, is puny to the degree it is barely detectable. I honestly wonder if convective cooling would not be as effective.
While this is funny for me, I imagine it is less amusing for owners whose hot end jams on them all the time. Heat creeping up from the hot end needs to be removed as quickly as possible, if this does not happen the melt zone moves upwards, filament expands too soon and, well - lets just say this design could more aptly be called the jam-o-matic.
How to solve all the cooling issues discussed above? Buy two 24v 5015 radial fans, and check out my thingiverse design here:
V wheels on 4040 T-Slot Extrusions
We are talking here about the Z axis - the two vertical pillars and the carriages that run up and down them. When considering how to best design this axis, Wanhao made a truly incredible decision. The engineers mind boggles - V slot wheels like those shown in the picture, should go onto V slot rails. Such rails are designed with faces that precisely meet the angle of the wheels - as shown in the Fig 9 below. In this case however, they run directly on the 4040 extrusions that make up the rest of the frame. Look at Fig 7, and you will see the inside edges of these extrusions, where it contacts the V wheels on the Z, has two ridges running down it. The inevitable result? Fig 8, rapid wear on the wheels. Over time this will inevitably worsen, until play develops and the wheels can no longer hold a steady position and need to be replaced.
The thing is, Wanhao are supposed to be a technology company! They are supposed to be savvy with this stuff. If they really wanted to use 4040 rails for this application, they could have done it and made it work! With one caveat. Machine down the ridges, essentially replacing them with nice 45° faces. There would be no significant reduction in strength, and best yet, a competent machining shop could production line the process, 30 seconds per operation. Hell, a competent engineer could build a machine specifically for that purpose and it would cost no more than a couple of hundred $$. But I guess Wanhao did not think of this, or perhaps they thought it was too much effort. Nice.
My D9 is an earlier MK1, but I recently had an opportunity to ask someone who had just bought a new MKII if this "feature" was still in effect. Incredibly, it is.
Sprung Belt Preloaders?!
Of all the bad design choices made by Wanhao, I find this one the most offensive. Yes, I'm an engineer - I get offended by these things.
On any half decent 3D printer, or functional CNC machine that uses belts, there is a system that allows you to manually adjust the belt tension. These systems are not in any way complex, and can be bought off the shelf. As shown in this admittedly not great picture, the system they chose to use is a spring clip that fits around the belt and pulls it tight.
So, what is it about this that puts my knickers in such a twist? Simple really. As any 8 year old knows, the thing about springs, it that when you pull on them, they stretch. The thing about belts, like the 6mm Chinese GT2 Gates clones used here, is that they are designed - very specifically and very carefully - to not stretch. Or more accurately, to stretch as little as possible. Glass fibres, aramid etc, are all added to the belts to help them resist stretching. And then along come Wanhoa and says "hey duhh, lets add a spring to the belts!". I mean.... seriously?! OK OK but fine, I know some people reading this might object that other printers have these on (may be true, not sure) or that Wanhao did not invent them (which is true, then are sold by Openbuilds as "torsion springs") - but this is not an excuse. The D9 300 was released as a $700 printer - this in unacceptable.
To get more technical, this creates dynamic backlash - different from static backlash, in that it occurs mainly during movement. Backlash being the technical term for the print head being somewhere other than where it should be, and static backlash could be something like e.g. play or wobble in a system, such as looseness on a leadscrew nut. Dynamic backlash will increase the faster you try to print, effectively creating positional lag/overshoot which will manifest e.g. as degrading fine details, or other unwanted artefacts like ghosting. One way to avoid this then is to limit your print speed, or to reduce jerk settings - which many people with the D9 do. Print speeds from 15 to 40mm/s max are common on unmodified units.
Fortunately, a real fix is pretty simple. Use belt tensioners such as this excellent pair of designs by Bleugh:
Note that with both these designs, you only actually need to print the ones opposite the stepper motors. The stepper motor bracket for the x axis on the MKI is pretty stiff already, while the bracket for the y isnt really stiff enough - but when it flexes, it does so in a way that pushes the stepper towards the frame. So just jam a bit of plastic or card between the two. Sorted. And the MKII I believe has aluminium brackets.
Sprung V Wheel
Again with the sprung preload! All three axis have these systems in place. And again, there really is no excuse. Other manufacturers, like Creality, use the widely available eccentric spacers, best known in Openbuilds systems. See below Fig 11 for Wanhaos implementation of spring preload, and what an eccentric spacer looks like in Fig 12. To be fair, the spring is at least constrained, so that movement can only occur in one direction only when an externally applied force is large enough to overcome the spring (unlike the free floating belt tensioner spring). But still, it is a poor choice, and clearly insufficient on the weighty Y axis which is easy to twist and move by hand.
To minimise movement, you need to tighten both springs up, but this in turn creates another problem. As the plate and wheel(s) are pulled in, the angle of the wheel on the V rail changes - or in the case of the Z axis, the angle on the 4040 extrusion masquerading as a rail. This means it will not be able to hold its position as well, it will create uneven wear and it will place unwanted forces on the already cheap, dodgy Chinese bearings in the V-wheels.
Now, on the MKII Wanhao have switched the single V wheel on the spring plate to two V wheels. But since this doesn't address any of the core design problems, I cannot see how it improves the situation.
Eccentric spacers on the other hand, allow the user to simply turn them like a nut and tighten the V wheel against the shaft. It is a simple and elegant system that produces well constrained carriages with essentially no backlash. I have no idea why Wanhao thought this setup was insufficient - perhaps they just wanted to be different, or they didn't trust their users to manually adjust the spacers into position (even though it is child's play).
For the Y axis, to begin with I added two spare mini V gantry plates as shown here: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3906204
For the X axis, here is a mod I made that essentially changes it from sprung to solid preload: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3914066
For the Z axis, especially with the 4040 "rail" issue discussed above, your only real solution is to pray for a swift and merciful death. Or buy and install some proper linear rails like the MGN12, perhaps less dramatic. In the end I realised this, and since I was swapping the Z I decided to swap the X and Y also.
Another fun one! So, the D9 has a 3mm aluminium hot plate, on top of which they clip a sheet of 3mm glass. And then a 0.5mm layer of steel is glued to the glass (adhesive seems to vary). Which is interesting, because there are two reasons people use glass for 3d printer beds. The first is that is it extremely flat, and the second is that it makes an OK surface to extrude on to - or at least a surface for other additives. I'm not such a fan, but many people like it. Unfortunately, D9 build surfaces are far from flat, and they then add a magnetic build surface on top - completely nullifying both the reasons for using glass in the first place.
I am not sure whether the problem is with the steel and glass having different thermal expansion coefficients, or if they simply come out the factory bent. It may be the latter, as there seems to be a degree of luck in whether peoples build plates are flat or not. Worst still for me, my aluminium heating plate, while relatively flat by comparison, has a small bow to it as well, but in the opposite direction to the glass/metal. Unsurprising as it is also only 3mm thick. As such I would estimate that there was probably a 3mm gap in normal use between the hot plate and the glass at the centre of the bed. Wonderful.
Solution: Check to see if your glass is similarly warped, then check the aluminium plate underneath. More people have luck with the aluminium being flat, so in my case I bought a nice powder coated PEI spring sheet steel from the linked vendor on Aliexpress - I can highly recommend this seller both for the product and the customer service.
It comes with a magnetic sheet, peel off for sticky on one side. I stuck it straight to the aluminium, and the spring steel sits nicely on top. So much better! It is even happy at temperatures up to 140°C (284°F), unlike the Wanhao flexible magnetic build surface which starts to demagnetise above 60°C. Of course, the hot bed on the D9 is underpowered with around 0.2W/cm(2) - but they vary quite a lot due to poor quality control, mine outputs around 190W whereas other people have measured theirs closer to 250W. As such my own unit cannot reach much over 90°C. Power levels of 0.4 to 0.6W/cm(2) would be required to heat the bed up for ABS level temperatures.
What is this, they got their geometry wrong? Well yes, actually they screwed up here as well! Specifically, we are interested in the position of the nozzle when referenced to the lead screw nuts holding the Z axis in place, and the multiple places where flex/backlash can occur. Look at this picture:
Consider - the extruder/hot end, carriage, X stepper, and V rail (hidden behind the 4 screws in the middle, using Bleughs belt tensioning system) are all essentially hung off the Z axis nut, that you can see to the far right in this image. The Z wheels on the 4040 "rail" are there to keep these parts upright, but ultimately the force is transferred to the nuts meaning we still have something of a lever system. Important then is the distance of the nozzle to these two nuts - and here the Wanhao engineers chose a configuration that placed them literally as far apart as possible. Ideally, these parts would arranged with the nuts and nozzle essentially in a straight line when viewed from the side. Admittedly this is very difficult to achieve, however on the D9 the nozzle is overhanging about 163mm or 6 1/2". This is huge, and at each connection point more flex is added into the system. The worst connection is the way the X carriage is held to the rail, this can flex a ton, but the single bar you can see joining the X rail to the Z carriage (in the middle, in front of the Z axis 4040 "rails") also flexes, as does the X rail itself with torsional flex (it can easily be felt vibrating during prints). All this flex leads to potential vertical movement in the nozzle, mostly in the form of vibrations but potentially also static backlash, none of which is good for print quality.
Solution: Unfortunately, there is no easy solution. I did consider rearranging the position of all the parts and printing new brackets, but it was too much hassle given the shortcomings of the V wheels and their poor implementation. I am currently moving to linear rails instead, and will do a complete redesign then. Watch this space, or message me for updates.
... or rather, the lack of them on the MK1. Again, these have been added to the MK2, but you still have to wonder, what were they thinking? The core problem is that the vertical aluminium extrusions that form the Z axis, were free floating at the top. Only constrained by small angle brackets at the base - see picture, you can just about make the brackets out. It was trivial for me to try printing something and touch the top of the extrusions. They were clearly and obviously vibrating. What use is 400mm build height, if the top end can move around so much?
That said, Wanhao are not alone in making this absurd design choice - other companies such as Creality have shipped designs that need to be modified in this way just to be functional higher up the Z axis. Wanhao of course just copied them.
Solution? Wanhao used to offer these "free" and for "just postage cost" of $30, which seems a little high given that the Chinese Government subsidises shipping but hey. You now have to buy them and pay postage. Fortunately there are braces you can print, such as the ones I designed to use M10 threaded rods:
Wanhaos latest firmware is based on Marlin 1.1.4 - released in July 2017. Given the breakneck pace of development in 3d printing over the last few years, this is badly out of date. And they only updated and released this version after a great deal of hassling from irate owners. Worst still, they didn't even do a good job. Marlin original 1.1.4 contains features like babysteps - the ability to tweak Z position during the start of the print to get a perfect first layer. Wanhao chose not to include it. Instead, during the auto-homing procedure you can adjust Z height in increments of 0.1mm. Given first layer heights are often in the range of 0.15mm, that is simply too large. Another "feature" Wanhao added which annoyed me no end, was to cause the x and y axis to go to home when you cancel a print. Sounds great, except this happens without raising Z first and without consideration for the shape of the bed. As such, if you are on your first layer, and your bed is slightly higher on the left than the right, the still very hot nozzle will be dragged over and into the soft, magnetic print surfaces. When I bought my second hand, little used D9 I noticed the bed was covered in a series of lines, all returning to an outside edge and then moving to a corner, two of which had small melt holes in them - and I wondered why. Now I know. So unless you install a new mainboard or reprogram the existing one (see below), the best way to cancel a print on the first layer is to hit the power off switch (and even then it starts moving on the X!). Speaking of Z height, when you set this during the auto-levelling process, it won't actually print at this height - instead it prints with the nozzle about 1mm above the height you have set. WTF? I have no idea. As a result, you need to push the nozzle about 1mm down into the bed during the auto level. But to get decent levelling, you also need to have the bed temperature set to printing temperature (it warps as it heats up). But you can only pre-heat the bed AND the nozzle, to pre-set PLA or ABS temperatures. The result? You have to push the now fully heated nozzle 1mm into the bed, and you quickly develop a small burn hole at that location.
And there are other problems, like the deeply unhelpful "it in in progress, please wait" error that essentially hangs the printer mid print. The last time I experienced this was 6h into a 1 day print. Yey. I figured it out in the end, but it was still annoying and unnecessary. Another one - they switched to a BLTouch probe on the MKII, and released new firmware for people to upgrade with, but didnt correct for the new offset during auto-levelling so it tries to level with the sensor off the back of the bed. Naturally, they have never actually corrected this, even though it would be trivial for them to do so. Nice. Finally, typifying the lack of care, fan speed is listed as 255% when at max - this is actually the PWM value, the way fan speed is controlled at the firmware level, which goes from 0-255. It is not a percentage. So e.g. a real 25% speed would be shown as 64%. This is a kindergarten level programming mistake. Worst, if you manually set fan speed you are given the normal range of 0-100% - only the same mistake is in effect, meaning if you set it to 100%, it will say 100% but you will only actually get 39%. Awesome! Thanks Wanhao.
Solution: Steve Wagg has ported a version of Tiny Machines Marlin 1.1.9, originally written for the Creality CR-10S Pro (uses the same LCD touchscreen as the D9). You may be able to flash your LCD and Mainboard with it, alas for reasons unknown I was unable to flash the LCD and had to buy a new mainboard and LCD instead. Quite a few people have also moved to the MKS GEN L, replacing the entire mainboard and drivers, and it apparently fits quite well - there are even mounts on thingiverse. Personally however I decided to go with a Duet 2 Maestro, supporting a UK based company that is innovating while also giving myself an epically good board.
Is that all you got?
Well, no, actually! I realise that this list might seem exhaustive, but it is really just my own experience after having worked with - mostly on - this printer for the last month or so. There is more, some sourced from the Wanhao Facebook group. Lets review in brief:
- Awful customer service from Wanhao (not the resellers, they seem pretty good). Common to Chinese 3d printer manufacturers, but Wanhao take it to the next level e.g. in refusing to release specifications for the stepper motors.
- Lazy assembly and poor quality control - although common with Chinese 3d printers, Wanhao take it to the next level. I spoke with someone who ran a well known Wanhao reseller site, and spent 3 years building up the business. He no longer sells the printers however, as he got tired of taking the flak. By his estimation and from customer feedback, over 50% of the units he sold had issues. Worst, he was stuck with over $4,000 of printers that simply didnt work straight from the factory. Wanhao did not reimburse. They made regular promises but never fixed the core problems, and instead simply moved on the D9. For a company that once had a strong and loyal following, with the D9 they totally burned any good will they once had.
- Sudden de-levelling has been noted by many users. They will have auto-levelled the bed and it will be working fine, and then when starting a new print the nozzle will crash into the bed. This can only be fixed by doing a factory reset, and is thought to be caused by corruption of the config files. Which in turn may be due to either firmware issues or cheap electronics components - my bet is on the latter.
- Low quality bearings on the V wheels causing them to "stick" at their previous resting point and creating wobble as the wheels move along the rails. Another common problem on Chinese 3d printers, a result of their using cheap Chinese bearings. Running the numbers, budget but serviceable bearings from a European vendor and bought in bulk, would cost about £42 / $53 for the MKI or £56 / $72 for the MKII, which has extra wheels. So this is a significant cost. I do not think this is an excuse, but in the quest for reducing 3d printer costs, you can understand the decision.
- Moire, also known as zebra stripes or salmon skin can be quite a problem with the extruder. Although this is an issue with many extruders, especially direct drive systems, it is extra bad on Wanhao products - not just the D9. Cheap steppers, bad tuning, and poorly designed extruder systems all contribute to this. Some people have found that adding TL smoothers helps, but you really need a better hot end entirely, such as this one designed specifically for the D9: Bondtech Extruder Upgrade (amazon affiliate link).
- Electronics issues - my splitter board failed and needed to be replaced. The splitter board is basically a breakout board for the ribbon cable, and apparently this is a known issue on the MKI, caused by components being under-rated for the voltage/current capacity. Another school yard error then. I have seen people complaining of other electrical problems, from the printer just switching off on them mid print, to the power break sensor glitching and needing to be removed, or even the mainboard simply dying. The list goes on.
- The D9 has no filament runout sensor - which is annoying for users of the 300x300 printer, but crazy for the 500x500. The whole point of all that space is to enable users to print massive parts, which could easily use a whole reel. But this printer just keeps on printing air regardless.
- Speaking of the x500 version, the heating elements are the same size as the x300. Meaning there is a 100mm gap between the elements and the edge of the bed. This is astonishingly bad - users have measured a temperature difference up to 35°C (95°F) between the centre and edges of the bed. Also although I have not had confirmation, I suspect then that the power level is the same as the already underpowered x300, which would have obvious consequences for time taken to heat up and maximum temperature.
So, is there anything Wanhao actually did right??
I'm struggling here. In all honesty, I am not writing this article as someone with a personal grudge against Wanhao - at least, no more than is reasonable given the pain they have put me and all other D9 users through. So let's see....
- Runs on 24v supply, rather than 12v - this gives you better performance from the steppers (more torque at higher speed), ability to use thinner wires like the ribbon cable, and theoretically more power for the heat bed. I say theoretically, as have an old 12v printer than can reach higher bed temperature than the D9, so while this would have been nice, the hot bed is unfortunately underpowered.
- The bulk of the frame is 4040 aluminium extrusion, admirably stiff and strong. Joints are solid and sturdy. Some of the hardware is good, such as machined aluminium brackets and quality leadscrew couplings. The downside of a 4040 frame is that it is unnecessarily overbuild, which means more expensive in parts as well as extra shipping / handling costs. Paid for, ultimately, by the customer.
- I quite like the ribbon cable? It has come under fire from some users, but I think it a neat solution.
- LCD touchscreen - you have to give it a much sharper poke than the screens on our phones, but once you get used to it, it is pretty nice. I don't like the lack of options presented by the touchscreen, actually a well fleshed out menu structure in text with a standard dial would be better. But software aside, the touchscreen itself works reasonably well.
- Looks pretty cool?
That's all I got...
Some people might point to the "power recovery" feature which lets you restart a print if the power fails, however since I live in the UK and not in Africa or California (jk), this is not particularly helpful!
Recommendations instead of the D9
Clearly, if you have got this far, you can see the D9 is not a printer to buy, unless you have a fetish for analysing engineering fails <cough>. So, which to buy instead? The Creality CR-10S or CR-10S Pro are the clear choices.
Although I have no experience with this printer myself, it is much loved by reviewers all over the internet. I was going to buy it myself, until the D9 came up looking like a good deal. Damnit.
A few features on the CR-10S compare with the D9:
- Eccentric spacers holding the V wheels in place - instantly superior to the D9's dodgy sprung preload system. Y axis has a single 20x40 V rail with x6 V-wheels in a row. No issue with dual rail alignment issues, much more rotational stiffness. I would be interested to see if there is potential for rocking side to side, but eccentric spacers should keep it pretty tight.
- Much stronger design and geometry - for instance how the X axis is held in place, implementation here is infinitely better with both the lead screw and nozzle being much tighter into the rail, and the setup generally being much stiffer. Also there are some lovely engineering touches, like running the X axis belt almost inside the rail.
- Filament runout sensor.
- Max bed temp 100°C on 10S, 110°C on 10S Pro reached in 5 minutes
- 2x geared extruder on 10S Pro
- Actual manual belt tensioners! Revolutionary I know....
- MUCH bigger and more active community base = more easily accessible upgrades. I was shocked about how little was available for the D9 and how much I had to do myself - I suspect most people simply gave up on it.
- Seeing the Benchy prints people get without a single modification, makes me feel genuinely sick. I'm not even joking.
Places for improvement would be adding Z braces, and perhaps a better part cooling setup - existing one is similar in many ways to the MKII. Also note that there are question marks about quality control, and Crealities customer service is just as non-existent as Wanhaos. However, the active community base and genuinely well designed product, more than makes up for these issues.
Yes, this is a stupidly long article, so let me sum up each point
- Extruder and Part Cooling: Totally useless axial fans in the MKI mean part and heat sink cooling are completely broken. They didnt even manage to aim the tiny part cooling flow at the hot end. MKII improved here, but still poor implementation. Heat sink cooling in general should be renamed the "jam-o-matic" due to its utter inability to stop heat creep.
- V wheels on 4040 T-Slot Extrusions: 4040 rails are not designed for V slot wheels, and cause rapid wear. Wanhao could have machined in the correct profile, but chose not to.
- Sprung Belt Preloaders: Springs are designed to stretch. Belts are designed not the stretch. See the problem? A quick way to introduce dynamic backlash.
- Sprung V Wheel: Another sprung preload system holding each axis, but doing a poor job of it. Allows carriages to flex on each rail, causes uneven wear, exacerbates problems with cheap bearings.
- Bed Warping: Steel glued to glass hot plate either came from factory warped, or repeat heat cooling cycles made them warp together due to uneven thermal expansion/contraction. My unit probably had 3mm between glass and aluminium hot plate underneath in the middle.
- Additionally, heated bed underpowered at around 0.2W/cm(2), mine maxes out around 92°C. 0.4-0.6W/cm(2) would be needed to reach higher bed temperatures preferred by ABS.
- Geometry: Nozzle placed as far from Z nut as conceivably possible, huge overhang. Bad design choice.
- Z Braces: Lack of them in MKI meant that top of Z axis vibrated around like crazy during use, completely unusable for tall objects.
- Firmware: Marlin version outdated and with features missing, and other features added by Wanhao were badly implemented and can easily cause significant damage to build surface.
- Also issues with quality of V wheel bearings, electronics failing, awful quality control (estimated 50% units shipped had issues), config data corruption causing de-levelling (factory reset required), moire, 100mm space between heating element and edge of the bed on the x500 version, and lack of customer service from Wanhao central. Etc.
- Good things on the D9: Uses 24v power supply (more torque from steppers at speed), strong frame, nice hardware fittings (brackets etc) in some places, LCD touchscreen.
Conclusion: Epic Fail
The Chinese can create and engineer some great products. However, what people in the West do not see is the quality of goods that the Chinese produce for their internal market, which can be truly atrocious. For instance, the only people in China who drive Chinese cars are people who cannot afford foreign imports. An example I saw recently (on a Youtube channel I watch), was how the rubber on the engine air hose had simply perished after a year of use, causing air to be sucked directly into the engine, from the street, without going through the filters first. Rubber is a well understood product, with various grades available - that the engineers chose to use a low grade variety that will inevitably fail, not only speaks to an astonishing lack of care by the "designers" (quotation marks, as almost all Chinese cars are cheap copies of non-Chinese cars), but it also speaks to the mentality of the Chinese consumer. There is no culture of caring for their purchases - to the point of e.g. not bothering to check or change their engine oil. They buy products, use them until they break, and then throw them away. It is my opinion that a similar lack of care was displayed here by the Wanhao engineers. They designed the D9 as if they were selling to their internal market, without understanding that you simply cannot do this when exporting. Hopefully they will learn this lesson in the future, one way or another. That said, this is not the first sub-par product Wanhao have produced, and unfortunately it is unlikely to be their last. I can only hope this detailed breakdown will help others avoid the many, many hours of frustration, not to mention the considerable extra money I have had to pay, to fix this terrible 3d printer.
In closing, I leave you with this thread from the Facebook Wanhao board.... enjoy!